US Refiners Resist Trump’s Oil Vision: Why Switching to Domestic Crude Is a $Billion Gamble

U.S. refiners are pushing back against President Trump’s push to process more domestic oil, citing multi-billion-dollar costs, years-long timelines, and shrinking gasoline demand—even as tariff threats disrupt traditional Canadian and Mexican crude supplies.

Key Takeaways:
Infrastructure Mismatch:

70% of U.S. refineries are built for heavy Canadian/Mexican crude, not light shale oil.

Retrofitting a medium-sized plant costs 100s of millions and takes 3–5 years (Exxonspent 2B on its Beaumont upgrade).

Market Realities:

Gasoline demand growth is near-zero in the U.S. (+0.2% in 2025) as EVs gain share.

Refiners like Phillips 66 and LyondellBasell are shutting plants rather than retooling.

Tariff Fallout:

Though energy imports were exempted, trade uncertainty discourages long-term bets.

Refiners may turn to Colombian heavy crude if Canada/Mexico flows dip—not shale.

Peak Shale Warning:

Analysts predict U.S. light oil output will peak by 2030s, while global heavy crude grows into the 2040s.

“Converting refineries now would be a strategic mistake,” says John Auers of Refined Fuels Analytics.

Industry Voices:
Chevron: “Investments require long-term certainty—not short-term tariff swings.”

Valero: Blending more light crude cuts diesel/jet fuel yields, hurting profits.

IIR Energy: “A presidential term is too short to justify billion-dollar bets.”

US Refiners Resist Trump’s Oil Vision: Why Switching to Domestic Crude Is a $Billion Gamble
Scroll to top