Mexico is standing firm in its demand for the United States to substantiate the safety of imported genetically modified (GM) corn for its populace, as Deputy Agriculture Secretary Victor Suarez emphasized the need for scientific validation. The ongoing dispute between the two nations, unfolding within the framework of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, underscores Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding the health of its citizens amidst concerns over GM corn and glyphosate.
In a formal submission to a panel overseeing the trade pact, Mexico, a significant buyer of U.S. corn, underscored its stance that GM corn and glyphosate pose health risks to humans and native corn varieties. The submission, dated January 2024, was publicly disclosed by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, highlighting Mexico’s unwavering stance on the issue.
Deputy Secretary Suarez reiterated that Mexico awaits compelling scientific evidence from the United States to refute concerns regarding the safety of GM corn, a staple in the daily diet of Mexicans through various food products like nixtamalized dough and tortillas. The burden of proof rests on the U.S. to demonstrate that GM corn poses no harm to Mexico’s population.
While the United States contends that Mexico’s decisions lack a scientific basis and advocates for the safety of GM corn, Mexico remains steadfast in its quest for transparent evidence from U.S. authorities and companies. The exchange of scientific data is pivotal in resolving the impasse and addressing Mexico’s reservations regarding GM corn consumption.
The dispute holds significant implications for U.S. corn exports to Mexico, a critical market for American farmers facing challenges amid reduced demand and declining prices. The clash also underscores broader debates surrounding biotechnology and consumer perceptions of genetically modified products globally.
Amidst assertions from U.S. officials affirming the safety of biotech products like GM corn over decades, Mexico remains resolute in its commitment to prioritize public health and well-being. The trade conflict underscores the complexities at the intersection of trade, agriculture, and public health considerations, shaping the discourse on GM crops and food safety standards in international markets.